- Hubris and greed at bankrupt FTX does massive damage; Bitcoin, regulated companies and custodians are biggest winners; bank run on Crypto.com, offshore cryptocurrency exchanges.
FTX collapse is crypto’s darkest day: Who can we trust now?
Writing a biweekly newsletter like Crypto Minutes in the midst of a huge breaking story is like trying to empty a lake with a teacup in the middle of a thunderstorm: there's no possible way to keep up.
We can likely all agree on one thing, though. The FTX/Alameda collapse began the worst week in crypto market history. If not, it was pretty damn close. The head of the world's second-largest crypto derivatives exchange, a man whose face had been on the front of Time magazine, put his $32bn company into bankruptcy. How did the house of cards collapse so quickly?
The exchange's founder Sam Bankman-Fried secretly transferred $10bn of customer funds from FTZ into market-maker/hedge fund Alameda Research, sources told Reuters. It's hard to find the words. Just, wow. So illegal.
Incompetence, hubris, greed, no risk management, 100x leverage and a casino mentality, no safeguards, rehypothecated loans, where do we even begin with the rest of it? In short, a pale-faced crook and his house of goons in the Bahamas embody all the worst excesses of finance, packed together in a big bundle.
The bankrupt exchange now faces criminal investigation in the country where its headquarters are located.
Asset managers CoinShares, 21Shares and Van Eck have of course been forced to suspend their FTX ETPs, just as they were forced to suspend their Terra Luna ETPs just months after launch and report substantial losses when the algo stablecoin collapsed in May.
It started with a news story, as these things usually do. After seeing the $14.6bn Alameda balance sheet, Binance CEO Changpeng ‘CZ' Zhao, an early investor in SBF's risky altcoin casino, said he would liquidate Binance's entire $580m holdings in FTT, the native token of the FTX exchange. Buying FTT tokens is like buying a seat at the New York Stock Exchange: giving users a discount on trading fees. But Bankman-Fried had been using FTT as collateral in loans. Lots and lots of very big and very risky loans.
Until the start of November 2022, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) was worth around $17bn. VCs, politicians and SEC chair Gary Gensler all fawned over him. In a matter of days, he lost most of his fortune. The one-time face of the industry was retitled in popular culture as ‘Scam Bankman-Fraud'.
And the news keeps getting worse. Every day another shocking story comes out about FTX and the biggest crypto-native market maker Alameda Research. Hacks, insider trading, the fact that the Alameda CEO had just 19 months trading experience before managing a $1bn fund? SBF reportedly had a secret ‘backdoor' that allowed him to move funds around without his auditors noticing.
FTX could have up to one million creditors, new bankruptcy filings show: it will take some time just to unpack who owes what.
Some of the most sophisticated traders and investors in the business did not see this coming. Larry Cermak, the head of research at The Block, was one of many industry insiders who held all of his funds on FTX. Kevin Zhu of Galois Capital, an early critic of failed stablecoin TerraUSD who made millions shorting LUNA months before it collapsed in May. He held half his $80m hedge fund's AUM on FTX.
Both will join a long line of creditors who may have to wait years to get a scrap of what is left over. Bitcoin exchange Mt Gox, which collapsed after a hack in 2014, is still going through the arbitration process.
What we learned
In traditional finance, exchanges cannot be custodian funds.
Exchanges should not be banks that hold customer funds.
It's worth repeating, only louder. EXCHANGES SHOULD NOT BE BANKS.
Especially if they are not regulated like banks, and provide no recourse to customers when money is lost.
It should be obvious, but it is worth stating: ETC Group has never had any business relations with FTX or Alameda Research.
When designing our ETPs, it was essential to the team that investors' assets are strictly separated from any interests of companies and market participants. Details and mechanics were built into the product structure of our ETPs that now suddenly turn out to be very crucial: Regulated custodians, independent administrators, no trading in the ETP itself, and of course, 100% physical backing at all times, with no lending of the underlying assets. All information can be found in the base prospectus of our ETPs launched in Germany.
In truth, Alameda Research likely collapsed back in May along with the implosion of Terra Luna, the massive losses racked up at Three Arrows Capital, bankrupt Voyager Digital and lender Celsius.
Lukas Nuzzi, head of R&D at Coin Metrics, showed a chain of transfers of FTT between FTX and Alameda suggesting Bankman-Fried provided an $8.6bn bailout for Alameda in Q2 2022 using FTT tokens.
Alameda Research grew to become one of the largest market makers in the crypto industry, providing billions of dollars-worth of liquidity across illiquid tokens. We would expect illiquid altcoins outside the top 10 most-traded to take the biggest hit from this. Expect wide spreads and few buyers.
The entire Alameda desk seems to have been propped up by FTX and co-mingling (stealing) client funds. We said at the time that mishandling client funds is not a mistake, it is flat out fraud. And that is the charge that Alameda will have to face.
Alameda Research was frontrunning token listings, according to data provider Argus.
It begs the question: how did FTX and Alameda lose so much when they clearly had the whole system tied up? They had illicit advance knowledge of which tokens would list, and ran the casino, trading against their customers, but still managed to lose $10bn? That's some pretty special level of incompetence.
The FTX collapse could not really have come at a worse time. Sentiment in crypto, it seemed, was starting to turn back for the better.
And we had a clear vision of what might have happened next: equities went on the biggest two-day rally since 2008 after US CPI print of 7.7% showed disinflationary consumer pricing, setting up what could be the end of the Fed's rate hike cycle. The S&P 500 gained 9.4% in two days. That should have meant even greater upside in crypto markets.
Bitcoin, regulated companies are biggest winners
Industry participants like ETC Group have been pleading for better and more comprehensive regulation across the industry, and the EU has MiCA legislation now expected to come into force in 2024. But that is Europe. FTX is very much an offshore US story.
The death of FTX and Alameda have prompted much soul searching in the industry, and this can only be a good thing.
It should come as no surprise that there will be two big winners from FTX, once the dust settles.
Winner #1: Bitcoin
Bitcoin was hardly affected by the FTX scandal. It has little use in DeFi. And smaller investors have been scooping up Bitcoin in their droves. Those who have wallets holding up to 0.1 BTC ($1,681), have climbed substantially since the start of the year, despite the price of Bitcoin falling by 62%.
Those holding up to 1 BTC (worth around $16,000) have jumped by 40% since the turn of 2022. In the last two weeks, amid the FTX drama, small holders have improved their holdings by more than 5%.
And Bitcoin saw the largest one-day change in holdings for those investors with 1 BTC or less in their wallets
Will Clemente at Blockware Solutions has a chart for this.
Looking at the wallets that hold between 0.01 and 1 BTC ($169 to $16,900), we can see that these investors have bought more BTC this week than at any other point in Bitcoin's history. BTC being reallocated from over-leveraged traders to value-seeking retail is very bullish for the ecosystem.
The utility of Bitcoin and other blockchains grows with their wider adoption. As a technology akin to a social network - but for exchanging value instead of data - the more users and holders the Bitcoin network has, the more useful it becomes.
Bitcoin will survive FTX. To be protected, however, investors must move away from unregulated platforms and start looking at regulated, reliable products.
Winner #2: Regulated companies, ETPs and custodians
If anyone sees a ETC Group Bitcoin product trading on regulated stock exchanges in Europe, they know without question it is 100% physically backed by BTC held in cold storage with the regulated custodian BitGo.
Exchange Traded Products like BTCE rely on a foundation of regulated companies. They cannot just go bankrupt and leave a trail of destruction in their wake. And those investors who still want exposure to Bitcoin, Ethereum and other blockchains, without having to custody their own funds or worry about trading on unregulated exchanges, will turn to companies like ETC Group, which is overseen by the German market regulator BaFin.
If there is an audit coming, and companies are having to move money around just before or just after, that is not a good sign that they are acting within the law.
Deribit, Huobi and a swathe of custodial exchanges have been scrambling to post proof that they hold their customer's funds in the wake of the FTX scandal.
But the absolute clown show going on behind the scenes at offshore exchanges like Crypto.com is being exposed, and with good reason. The CEO of Crypto.com admitted that his company accidentally sent $400m in ETH to rival exchange Gate.io “in error”, before asking for it back.
A preliminary audit found that 20% of Crypto.com's assets were in the Shiba Inu memecoin.
Markets
Last week was one of the most volatile in crypto history, with both BTC and ETH registering double-digit losses before stabilising.
Solana, a token heavily supported by FTX and SBF, racked up huge losses in the region of minus 57% and was the worst-hit by the crisis. ETH scalability token Polygon (MATIC), which inked NFT deals with social media giants Instagram and Reddit, and was used in JP Morgan's first live DeFi trade on 9 November, was one of only two tokens that ended up in the green across the fortnight.
Contagion is a strange thing: once it spreads it is difficult to contain. The evident silver lining is that a massive amount of leverage had exited the industry in May and June, so the fallout from FTX may not be as bad as has been suggested elsewhere.
They may be far behind where they should be. But Bitcoin and Ethereum will survive this.
Informations importantes
Communication à caractère promotionnel. Les informations contenues dans le présent Document sont fournies à des fins d’information et de pédagogie. Elles ne constituent ni un conseil en investissement, ni une recommandation personnalisée, ni une sollicitation en vue d’acheter ou de vendre un instrument financier.
Le présent Document (qui peut prendre la forme d’une présentation, d’un communiqué de presse, d’une publication sur les réseaux sociaux, d’un article de blog, d’une communication audiovisuelle ou d’un support similaire – ci-après le « Document ») est émis par Bitwise Europe GmbH (« BEU » ou l’« Émetteur »).
Bitwise Europe GmbH est constituée selon le droit allemand et agit en qualité d’émetteur des produits négociés en bourse (« Exchange Traded Products » ou « ETP ») mentionnés dans le présent Document. Les ETP sont émis sur la base d’un prospectus de base et de conditions définitives, susceptibles d’être complétés. Un prospectus a été publié ou, le cas échéant, sera publié conformément au Règlement (UE) 2017/1129. Les investisseurs peuvent obtenir gratuitement le prospectus de base, les conditions définitives applicables ainsi que tout supplément éventuel sur le site www.bitwiseinvestments.eu/fr
L’approbation d’un prospectus par l’autorité compétente ne constitue ni une approbation ni une recommandation des instruments financiers concernés.
Capital à risque. Les crypto-actifs sont des actifs hautement volatils et présentent un risque élevé. La valeur des investissements dans des crypto-actifs ou dans des ETP liés aux crypto-actifs peut fluctuer fortement à la hausse comme à la baisse et les investisseurs peuvent perdre tout ou partie de leur capital investi.
Les ETP liés aux crypto-actifs sont des instruments financiers complexes et peuvent ne pas convenir à tous les investisseurs. Ils peuvent exposer les investisseurs à des risques spécifiques, notamment un risque de crédit de l’émetteur, un risque de liquidité, des risques opérationnels ainsi que des risques liés au fonctionnement, à la réglementation et à la valorisation des marchés des crypto-actifs sous-jacents.
Aucun mécanisme de garantie du capital ne s’applique. Selon la juridiction et le mode de détention, les investisseurs peuvent ne bénéficier d’aucun mécanisme public d’indemnisation ou de protection des investisseurs.
Les performances passées ne constituent pas un indicateur fiable des performances futures. Toute déclaration prospective reflète des hypothèses et des anticipations et ne constitue pas une garantie de résultats futurs.
Avant toute décision d’investissement, les investisseurs doivent lire attentivement le prospectus de base, les conditions définitives applicables et notamment la section intitulée « Avertissements ». Une décision d’investissement doit tenir compte de la situation personnelle de l’investisseur, de ses objectifs, de son horizon d’investissement et de sa capacité à supporter des pertes potentielles. Le cas échéant, il convient de solliciter un conseil indépendant en matière financière, fiscale et juridique.
Un avertissement détaillé sur les risques applicables aux ETP liés aux crypto-actifs est disponible à l’adresse suivante : www.bitwiseinvestments.eu/fr/risk-warning
