Corporate Treasuries Turn to Ethereum’s Yield

Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) have emerged as a new corporate structure in the equity markets. They are publicly traded entities that raise capital with the explicit mandate to invest, hold, and, in some cases, actively manage their reserve assets. Traditional companies might accumulate Bitcoin or other crypto holdings as a complementary strategy to their primary operations, whereas DATs are purpose-built with the digital asset itself as the core of their business model.

The idea began with Strategy (MSTR, formerly known as MicroStrategy), which pioneered BTC balance sheet accumulation based on the thesis that Bitcoin provides a hedge against monetary debasement. Michael Saylor, the Founder and Executive Chairman's interest in Bitcoin came as a result of watching the Federal Reserve increase the US Dollar money supply. Today it is up ~43% since March 2020.

Strategy began with a simple approach: It would raise equity capital and buy bitcoin. Over time, however, its capital structure became more complex, introducing convertible debt, preferred equity, and other capital market innovations designed to help it raise capital cheaply to deploy into bitcoin. Other DATs have taken this strategy and deployed it to other assets.

DATs have had a transformative impact on bitcoin, with DAT purchases being a primary factor in bitcoin's strong performance versus other assets in the 2024 to early 2025 period. The emergence of ETH DATs also had the same effect, so we thought it was worth uncovering.

Here are some key stats as of 22/09/2025 per Dr Schellinger at Crypto Treasury Tracker:

• Market dominance: BTC (88.6%), ETH (9.4%), SOL (1.5%)
• Weekly inflows: BTC (+2,487), ETH (+91,660), SOL (+7.96M)
• Share of circulating supply: BTC (9.16%), ETH (4.34%), SOL (2.72%)

This Espresso focuses on the growth of Ethereum DATs, which are gaining traction, driving demand for ETH and reshaping supply dynamics. Can DATs do for ETH what they did for BTC? Could they be even more successful? This piece looks into the trend.

Demand outweighs Supply
A Structural Bid Continues

ETH DATs are absorbing more ETH than net new supply (issuance - burn) adds to circulation. For example, purchases in August equated to ~1.97M ETH, which dwarfed net new issuance of ~0.08M ETH, creating persistent demand pressure. This creates what we call a structural bid, where demand from DATs consistently exceeds supply dynamics. Over time, this dynamic reinforces ETH's scarcity and strengthens its position as a treasury asset.

ETH Purchases vs Net New Supply

ETH as a Yield-Bearing Treasury Asset
Proof of Stake assets redefine reserve return profiles

Bitcoin's capped supply and halving make it nearly impossible for treasury companies to

organically accrete more coins. This scarcity should force these DATs to raise capital at less favorable terms, therefore potentially diluting shareholders and reducing mNAV ratio (market capitalization / net asset value of reserve holding) to 1x over time. Unlike BTC, ETH's uncapped supply and network yield and DeFi strategies create a fundamentally different treasury asset and DAT return profile.

ETH DATs look more like operating businesses than BTC DATs, which simply buy and hold the asset. The income from staking and DeFi strategies enhances mNAV ratio because investors are pricing in future asset growth per share, without the necessary need for share dilution at opportune times. This feature is not possible with BTC DATs.

Hence, the ability to gain yield from staking or on-chain activity, beyond the underlying ETH balance, has proved to be attractive so far. Total ETH reserves held by DATs have surged to ~4.99M ETH, over 4.13% of circulating supply.

Ethereum's yield comes from three main sources:

1. staking rewards
2. transaction fees
3. MEV (extra value from how transactions are ordered).

Staking rewards are earned for helping secure the network, while transaction fees include both base fees and extra payments from users who want their transactions processed faster. MEV represents additional revenue that validators can capture by arranging transactions in certain ways.

Cumulative ETH Strategic Reserves

Growing Corporate Adoption
Increased Breadth and Depth of Holders

At the time of writing this report, the number of companies holding ETH reserves over 10 ETH (~$41.9k, as of writing) has steadily climbed to 68. This attests to breadth and depth of adoption for ETH as a treasury reserve asset. So far, the main dynamics are likely hype-related from the relative outperformance of ETH over the past six months. However, we still think this is likely to increase for a few reasons.

First, DATs are likely to become some of the largest “users” of the ecosystem. Maximizing the income generated from staking and other on-chain activity also maximizes the mNAV attributed to their equity, since yields will be higher relative to peers.

Staking not only produces revenue-it also provides DATs with influence over the protocol itself. This effect is most pronounced in on-chain governance systems such as Solana, but even in Ethereum, the largest DATs are likely to exert social pressure in off-chain governance debates.

Second, DATs serve as spokespersons to investors: Michael Saylor for Bitcoin and Tom Lee for Ethereum have both done tremendous jobs on shouldering career risk for investors and advancing the credibility of these assets on Wall Street and for institutions.

Finally, although more of a niche opportunity, DATs provide a new point of access for investors who might otherwise struggle to gain ecosystem exposure labs, foundations, or applications. By necessity, DATs must become large players and actively engage with these participants, making them a potential proxy for broader ecosystem involvement.

Weekly Number of Companies with ETH Reserves

The Top ETH Treasuries
Diverse Strategies, One Asset

The top five ETH treasuries illustrate the diversity of strategies emerging among corporate holders. While the scale of reserves varies widely, each has distinct objectives and roles to play in the ecosystem:

• Bitmine Immersion Tech (BMNR, 2.42M ETH, ~2% of supply) allocates ~1% of its balance into investments that support the Ethereum ecosystem and create value for equity shareholders. For example, its $20M strategic investment into Eightco Holdings Inc. which is adopting a first-of-its-kind strategy to acquire Worldcoin (WLD) as its primary treasury asset. This marked the start of BMNR's approach to back bold ideas that strengthen Ethereum's vast ecosystem.
• SharpLink Gaming (SBET, 0.84M ETH) remains fully committed to its gaming and interactive betting business but noted their ETH treasury strategy is complementary to their core operations. SharpLink stakes 100% of balance.
• The Ether Machine (ETHM, 0.50M ETH) will operate as a dedicated Ethereum-native treasury through staking, restaking, and active participation in the broader ecosystem. It also provides validator infrastructure for enterprises and backs open-source research and tooling.
• Ethereum Foundation (0.25M ETH) is a non-profit organization based in Zug, Switzerland (“Crypto Valley”), whose mission is to support Ethereum protocol's growth while maintaining decentralization. The Foundation funds research, developer resources, and community collaboration, anchoring Ethereum's long-term sustainability.
• PulseChain Sac (PLS, 0.17M ETH) is an alternative Layer 1, which leverages its ETH reserves to bootstrap development of the PulseChain ecosystem, with emphasis on cross-chain activity and building complementary infrastructure.
• Other (1.12M ETH collectively) consists of the rest of the entities that own over 10 ETH. This long tail shows breadth, but not necessarily staying power. Many of these will face the “falling star” trajectory where enthusiasm fades and valuations compress.

Top 5 ETH Treasuries + The Rest

Market Structure & Concentration
Sharks Dominate the Landscape

The distribution of DATs skews heavily toward “sharks” (1k–100k ETH) and “fish” (101–1k ETH), with relatively few “whales” and only one “mega whale” (BitMine). This depicts a future reality of a “winner takes most” outcome because raising capital at scale is easier for large, credible entities, while mid-sized DATs struggle to attract equivalent enthusiasm. We expect consolidation over time, with a small number of dominant players commanding most flows - much like what we've seen in BTC DATs.

ETH Treasury Size Distribution

Summary: ETH Treasuries Enter the Mainstream

Ethereum's evolution as a treasury asset is accelerating. DATs have transformed from a Bitcoin-centric play into a structural feature of the digital asset economy, now pulling ETH into balance sheets at scale. DATs are creating persistent demand that exceeds net new supply, reinforcing ETH's scarcity while layering on real yield from transaction fees and MEV.

Adoption is broadening. 68 entities now hold ETH reserves and the top five treasuries showcase diverse strategies ranging from corporate accumulation and staking, to foundations divesting for ecosystem growth. This diversification highlights Ethereum's dual role: both an economic reserve asset and a productive, yield-bearing instrument.

Yet the landscape is likely to consolidate in the future. Larger “mega whale” and “whale” DATs dominate flows, pointing toward a winner-takes-most future where credibility, scale, and governance influence compound over time. As this dynamic unfolds, Ethereum is carving out a unique position: not just a hedge or speculative play, but a programmable treasury asset that links corporate finance with on-chain economics.

In short: ETH treasuries are no longer a side story. They are becoming a structural pillar in crypto's capital markets.

Rechtlicher Hinweis

Diese Veröffentlichung stellt eine Marketingmitteilung dar und dient ausschließlich Informationszwecken. Sie stellt weder eine Anlageberatung noch eine persönliche Empfehlung oder eine Aufforderung zum Kauf oder Verkauf von Finanzinstrumenten dar.

Bitwise Europe GmbH ist Emittentin der in dieser Veröffentlichung gegebenenfalls genannten Exchange Traded Products („ETPs“) unter einem von der Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) gebilligten Basisprospekt. Die Billigung durch die BaFin bezieht sich ausschließlich auf die Vollständigkeit, Kohärenz und Verständlichkeit des Prospekts gemäß der Prospektverordnung und stellt keine inhaltliche Bewertung oder Empfehlung der Produkte dar.

Die dargestellten Marktanalysen, Einschätzungen und Szenarien spiegeln die aktuelle Einschätzung zum Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung wider und beruhen auf Informationen, die als zuverlässig erachtet werden. Es wird jedoch keine Gewähr für die Richtigkeit oder Vollständigkeit übernommen. Prognosen und zukunftsgerichtete Aussagen sind mit Unsicherheiten behaftet und stellen keine Garantie für zukünftige Entwicklungen dar. Die Wertentwicklung in der Vergangenheit ist kein verlässlicher Indikator für zukünftige Ergebnisse.

Investitionen in Krypto-Assets und krypto-bezogene Finanzinstrumente sind mit erheblichen Risiken verbunden und unterliegen starken Kursschwankungen. Anleger können einen Teil oder ihr gesamtes eingesetztes Kapital verlieren.

Eine Anlageentscheidung sollte ausschließlich auf Grundlage des jeweils gültigen Basisprospekts, der Endgültigen Bedingungen sowie des Basisinformationsblatts (KID), insbesondere des Abschnitts „Risikofaktoren“, getroffen werden. Der Basisprospekt, die Endgültigen Bedingungen sowie weitere Risikohinweise sind abrufbar unter: www.bitwiseinvestments.eu/de

Anleger sollten prüfen, ob eine Investition unter Berücksichtigung ihrer individuellen Anlageziele, ihrer finanziellen Situation und ihrer Risikobereitschaft geeignet ist, und gegebenenfalls unabhängigen fachlichen Rat einholen.