1. Executive Summary 
    
        - Markets digest strongest January: bulls overtake bears
            on-chain
 
        - Bitcoin NFTs race past 200,000 mints: sparks biggest debate
            in years
 
        - ETH deflation, revenue spikes as blockspace demand
            returns
 
        - Base: Coinbase launches Ethereum Layer 2 promising 1 billion
            users
 
        - Institutional moves show increased appetite for both crypto,
            tokenisation
 
    
    2. Overview
    Markets settled back to equilibrium in February after the strongest first month of
        the year in more than half a decade. Bitcoin’s return of 39.63% last month was its largest January
        gain since 2018, so it was natural to expect some consolidation at these higher levels. 
    Over the course of February, Bitcoin gained a modest 2.5% to finish the month at
        $23.1k, while Ethereum added 4.8% to close out at $1.6k. 
    Is on-chain data bearish or bullish?
    As the month closed out, mixed macroeconomic data and sliding equities weighed on
        crypto prices, but the total crypto market cap held firm above $1 trillion. 
    While traders generally sold into rallies, markets showed little appetite for a
        substantial sell off to bring prices back towards the cycle low of $15.8k Bitcoin in November 2022. 
    
    Just a quick aside, here.
    It’s worth explaining what we mean by ‘on-chain’ data. Just like
        other financial industries, crypto brings with it a huge set of jargon and new metrics to consider. 
    
    ETC Group’s popular Crypto
            Handbook outlines the basics for new starters, but analysts may still
        perceive readers as more advanced in decoding terminology than they actually are. With that in mind, ETC
        Group has committed to being clear and distinct in our reporting and education. 
    ‘On-chain’ data refers to the multitude of datapoints that blockchains
        produce from their daily usage. 
    This covers everything from transactions between wallets, to the dollar value moving
        through the network, to the number of holders of a particular coin or token. Analysis of this information
        can tell us how those numbers are changing over time and allow us to infer both certain usage statistics and
        general market trends. 
    SOPR: Price sold vs price paid
    One particularly useful metric which shows how traders are treating their Bitcoin
        holdings is SOPR, or Spent Output Profit Ratio. SOPR was created in 2019 by Glassnode analyst turned
        NFT-collector Renato
            Shirakashi. 
    It helps us to understand the state of economics in the Bitcoin ecosystem, acting as
        a proxy for the overall profit and loss in the market. SOPR is calculated using Bitcoin’s UTXO
        transaction model, by dividing the ‘realised value’ of a Bitcoin spent output, by the value when
        a Bitcoin output was created. 
    Values fluctuate around 1, with those above 1 indicating that Bitcoin holders are (on
        average) selling at a profit, because the Bitcoin price when sold, or realised, is higher than the price
        paid. Values below 1 implies the opposite, that holders are (on average) selling at a loss. 
    More simply, SOPR tracks price sold versus price
        paid. 
    The lowest value on record of 0.8749 came on 18 November 2022 amid the FTX collapse,
        and given the number of hedge funds and speculative traders caught up in that debacle, it suggests at the
        time that traders were having to cover margin calls, with the associated flood of crypto inventory onto the
        market sparking panic selling from weak hands. 
    By contrast, after January’s 39.6% run up in the Bitcoin price, February has
        been characterised by market players taking profits, with SOPR values generally well above 1. 
    
        
    
    When values remain above 1 after a long period below the line, we expect profit
        taking to dominate market proceedings. 
    As such, we categorise recent selling as profit skimming and not part of a structural
        downside trend. 
    Daily spot BTC/USD volumes also remain well above their 12 month average.
    Back in November, as the Bitcoin price dropped to its cycle low of $15,874, there was
        a rush to capitalise on both long and short positions, and traders pushed the daily average trading volume
        on exchanges to $76.7m.
    February’s daily average trading volume hit $37.4m, an 28.9% increase from
        January ($29m) and greater than 12 of the last 13 months. 
    
        
    
    20 February’s close price of $24,787 remains the peak of Bitcoin’s
        pricing in the year to date.
    Bitcoin NFTs race past 200,000 mints: sparks biggest debate in years
    Aside from a digital gold-like store of value, a new use case has suddenly appeared
        for Bitcoin. Anyone with an interest in the space has surely heard of Bitcoin Ordinals by now. If not,
        here’s the rundown. 
    Ordinals are a new standard to track individual satoshis — the smallest unit of
        BTC —  which can be used to inscribe arbitrary quantities of data into the Bitcoin blockchain.
        Arbitrary in this context just means ‘any amount’, rather than ‘a random amount’.
    
    The main complaint levelled at the Bitcoin network in its earliest incarnation was
        that it could only host one type of asset: BTC.
    When Ethereum arrived on the scene in 2015, it did so with a stated intent to be able
        to host any type of asset on its platform: birthing the ERC-20 standard that allows developers to launch a
        token relying on Ethereum’s security model, thereby growing their market share and network effects
        without having to build or run their own blockchain. 
    The following Cambrian explosion in development produced tokens with tens of billions
        of dollars of market cap, including Circle’s USDC stablecoin ($42bn), Uniswap ($5.1bn) and Chainlink
        ($3.1bn), all of which sit in the top 20 assets by market cap as of 28 February 2023.
    The use of Bitcoin’s network to host alternative assets other than BTC has
        proved controversial among Bitcoin maximalists. This group believes that Bitcoin is a public good and a
        monetary asset, and so its blockspace should be reserved only for transaction data. 
    Placing arbitrary data like text, pictures of penguins and videos into blocks is a
        waste of space and contrary to Satoshi Nakamoto’s original vision, they say. 
    The argument is not without merit, but it does ignore the fact that Bitcoin has
        greatly changed over time, and while today it still exists as a counterparty risk-free way of sending value
        across borders, its main use case has developed as digital gold. The velocity of money on the Bitcoin
        network has dropped significantly over time, suggesting that more holders see Bitcoin’s value rising
        in future than wish to spend it. 
    As Bitcoin Ordinals creator Casey Rodarmor tweeted: “I understand the argument that NFTs are lame and stupid, but I
        don't understand the argument that NFTs are somehow *illegitimate*. Bitcoin has transcended its original
        creator and purpose. Bitcoin is not *for* some things and *not for* other things. It just is.”
    
    
        
    
    The introduction of NFT-like assets on Bitcoin have enthused developers and brought
        forward an enticing new revenue stream to miners. Data from Dune Analytics shows that mints have climbed to
        228,000 as of 28 February 2023, producing almost $1.5m in new revenue for Bitcoin miners. 
    As a reminder, users of the Bitcoin blockchain pay fees to miners to have their
        transactions or data included in the next block. Once added, blocks cannot be removed from the Bitcoin
        blockchain, creating an indelible record that cannot be altered. 
    Pages like this are very helpful for live-tracking the use of Bitcoin Ordinals. As of the end of February,
        more than 59 BTC had been paid to include Ordinals in Bitcoin blocks. 
    The vast majority of Bitcoin Ordinals — more than 160,000 of the total —
        are images like NFT-style collections. However, as interest and usage of Bitcoin Ordinals grows we expect
        the additional use cases to grow in volume. It is also possible to inscribe individual satoshis with text,
        video clips, GIFs, audio files and even JSON applications.
    
        
    
    The creation of Bitcoin Ordinals requires a high degree of technical knowledge, and
        trading generally occurs OTC in disparate Discord servers instead of in public marketplaces. 
    But Bitcoin Ordinals have taken some of the wind out of Ethereum’s NFT sails
        and are growing so quickly that, over time, they may even delay The Flippening — the putative point at
        which Ethereum overtakes Bitcoin to become the largest crypto by market cap value. 
    Recent developments suggest that chain-agnostic market participants see long-tail
        value in Bitcoin Ordinals. Those early NFTs on Ethereum like CryptoPunks and Art Blocks now regularly sell
        for millions of dollars and there is hope that those collecting the first set of Bitcoin NFTs could be in
        for a similarly gigantic future windfall. 
    For example, the Bitcoin mining pool Luxor, creators of the hash price metric,
        snapped
            up the Bitcoin NFT marketplace Ordinals Hub on 20 February.
    
    NFT projects such as TaprootWizards, Ordinal Loops and PunksonBitcoin have already
        seen sale prices in excess of 10 BTC ($237,000), Luxor said.
    Yuga Labs, the company behind CryptoPunks and Bored Ape Yacht Club, also made
        moves in the latter part of February, releasing its first
            collection of Bitcoin Ordinals. Amid the first NFT craze of 2021, a
        seed funding round gave the company a monster $4bn valuation.
    Anticipating the level of future growth in Bitcoin NFTs is difficult, and analysts
        should be wary of arrow-flight projections, suggesting that any market will grow upwards in a linear fashion
        indefinitely. 
    However, with almost 60 BTC in fees already paid to miners for inscribing Ordinals,
        this provides a new revenue stream for miners looking ahead to the 2024 Bitcoin halving, where block rewards
        will be sliced in half from 6.25 BTC per block to 3.125 BTC.
    Halvings occur approximately once every four years. As part of Bitcoin’s fourth
        halving event, the amount of BTC created daily will drop from around 900 BTC per day to around 450 BTC per
        day. 
    ETH deflation, revenue spikes as blockspace demand returns
    Blockchains are a delicate balance of incentives: ask users to pay more fees and the
        network is more secure from attack and resistant to spam, and its supporters receive more valuable rewards,
        proportionally.  
    The average fees paid to stakers and validators on Ethereum have tripled since
        November 2022 with $161m in fee revenue recorded across February. That represents the largest monthly spend
        since October.
    Despite being a shorter month, February 2023’s total fees outpaced seven of the
        previous eight months. 
    
        
    
    And Ethereum’s deflationary supply tokenomics continue. 
    Data reviewed by ETC Group in February shows that Ethereum token supply is deflating
        at its fastest ever rate.
    Driving the shift are:
    
        - The after-effects of The Merge, which moved the network from
            Proof of Work to Proof of Stake and started to reduce supply. Under Proof of Work, miners were issued
            approximately 13,000 ETH per day. Stakers under the new system are instead issued ~1,700 ETH per day,
            cutting new issuance by around 88%. 
 
        - Increased ETH burn: This fluctuates according to network
            demand. 
 
        - Higher NFT trading volumes and DeFi TVL, shown by rising gas
            fees and increasing the associated ETH burn (where Ethereum tokens are deleted from circulation).
        
 
        - Ethereum’s upcoming Shanghai hard fork, which will allow
            stakers to withdraw locked ETH for the first time
 
        - Bullish headwinds in the crypto market more generally. 
        
 
    
    In the 165 days since The Merge, 40,550 ETH has been deleted from supply. 
    Liquid staking overtakes DeFi lending
    Liquid staking tokens have had a meteoric growth spurt, and with ETH unstaking just
        around the corner, Coindesk reports that the total value locked (TVL) in liquid staking protocols like Lido and Rocketpool has
        soared to outpace the TVL in DeFi lending and borrowing markets.  
    Lido first appeared on the market in December 2021, offering liquid staking on
        Ethereum. By depositing ETH into Lido’s protocol, users are given both a yield on their stake, akin to
        buying a dividend stock, as well as being given tokens as derivatives representing their ETH stake, called
        stETH.
     
    Each protocol or platform offers its own version. For example, Coinbase offers ETH
        stakers a derivative token called cbETH, while Lido gives out stETH tokens in reward for staking ETH through
        their platform.
    They can then take those derivative tokens and deposit them into other apps and
        markets, potentially earning additional yield. Lido’s governance token LDO has rocketed by more than
        200% in 2023. 
    What does Liquid Staking mean?
    There are two main limits to access staking for Ethereum token holders: 
    
        - Having a minimum deposit of 32 ETH 
 
        - Locking up staked ETH until withdrawals are made available after
            Shanghai
 
    
    Liquid staking derivatives like cbETH and stETH solve the initial problem by pooling
        together ETH deposits from multiple holders — akin to owning fractional shares — so that they
        can participate in validating blocks of transactions. 
    Lido, Coinbase, Kraken and others also allow ETH holders to stake without having the
        technical difficulty of running a validator node. The ETH tokens staked are also not available to use
        anywhere else: until the Shanghai upgrade comes into force in March. 
    Lido, Coinbase, Kraken and others offer these users liquid staking derivatives that
        they can take into the broader market, thereby utilising the value of their Ether, even
        if they don’t have the original tokens, which are now locked
        up. 
    Top 10 Ethereum staking protocols reach $20bn 
    With 17.4 million ETH deposited into Ethereum staking services as of 28 February
        2023, the top 10 Ethereum staking protocols and platforms now account for more than $20bn in deposits, the
        latest updates show. 
    
        
    
    While this concentration is something of a concern, the number of validators has also
        accelerated to almost 550,000 ahead of the Shanghai hard fork, ensuring Ethereum network security, and
        showing that interest in the blockchain is as high as it has ever been.
    Base: Coinbase launches Layer 2 promising 1 billion users
    It became something of a cliche to hear that bear markets are times for teams to
        build without having to worry about token prices. But one marker that investors are coming out of the worst
        of the downturn is the arrival of new products and features onto the market. 
    What institutions and corporates cannot do amid waning prices and falling interest is
        to launch new products and deploy large amounts of capital. 
    Simply, teams have been waiting until retail and institutional interest returns
        before debuting high-value projects on which they have been working. 
    Coinbase revealed the arrival of its Layer 2 (L2) Ethereum scaling solution Base at the end of February. The
        testnet for Base first went live earlier in the month and the mainnet will be rolled out in the coming
        months.
    Base is meant to be an open ecosystem where developers can build decentralised
        applications (dApps) while taking advantage of the security offered by the Ethereum network. The end goal is
        to make it easier for developers to make decentralised applications more easily. 
    It will be powered by Optimism’s open-source OP stack and be incubated inside
        Coinbase with it acting as a primary developer until it is completely decentralised. Base will be
        interoperable with other blockchains that have EVM compatibility like Avalanche or Fantom.
    There is a total of $6.3 billion worth of digital assets locked in Layer 2
        applications inhabiting the Ethereum ecosystem. From these, Arbitrum dominates the L2 arena with its 54% market share that amounts to $3.4 billion. There are over 20
        scaling products using rollup technology in the Ethereum environment.
    
        
    
    It will serve as an onramp for Coinbase’s on-chain products to the
        exchange’s 100 million strong verified user base. But anyone will be allowed to use Base as it is a
        permissionless network and does not require any KYC. 
    This means that this could drastically increase the amount of users interacting with
        the Ethereum network, as Coinbase looks to move a large mass of off-chain users on chain by seeing them
        interact with Ethereum products without using intermediaries and setting up addresses.
    There are no
            plans to issue a token for Base just yet. Base will use ETH as its
        native asset and users will pay for gas fees in ETH. Although, it is likely that Base will launch its own
        token at some point.
    The Ethereum L2 Optimism initially launched its network without a token and it has
        since airdropped OP governance tokens to early adopters of the network. Arbitrum is tipped to be planning
        the same thing.
    Optimism and Arbitrum are both optimistic rollups. They reduce congestion on the
        Ethereum network by processing transactions off-chain which makes transactions faster and cheaper. After the
        transactions are executed off-chain, the data is posted on the mainnet.
    Optimistic rollups are separate to zero-knowledge rollups that also execute bundles
        of transactions off-chain but publish cryptographic proofs of validity for off-chain transactions.
    
    They also produce validity
            proofs to prove the correctness of their changes. The validity proof
        demonstrates with cryptographic certainty that the proposed changes to Ethereum's state are truly the
        end-result of executing all the transactions in the batch.
    The news of Base using Optimism’s open-source technology led to rallies for tokens that belong to the Optimism ecosystem. Optimism’s OP token, VELO, the
        native token of the Optimism-based decentralised exchange Velodrome Finance, and OPX, the governance and
        utility token of OPX Finance, all saw gains. 
    Aside from Base, projects like Metis and Boba Network also use Optimism’s code
        base.
    The popularity of Optimism can be reflected in the dollar value of gas fees paid to
        make transactions on its platform. On average, users spend a total of $91,000
        every week to carry out transactions on Optimism. This is compared to the
        $66,000 spent on Polygon transaction fees and the $81,000 spent on gas fees to carry out trades on the
        Ethereum-powered stablecoin exchange Curve.
    Institutional moves suggest increasing appetite 
    According to CryptoCompare, the total assets under management for all cryptoasset
        investment products in February climbed by 5% compared to January. This is the third monthly increase in a
        row, and the figure of $28.3bn marks the largest AUM recorded since May 2022.  
    It seems that the dip-buying mentality is starting to extend out from retail towards
        institutions, too. 
    One survey released this month by deVere Group indicates that since the start of 2023, 82% of high net worth
        investors had asked their financial advisors about Bitcoin and other digital assets. “Interestingly,
        this typically more conservative group were not deterred by the bear market and adverse market
        conditions,” the report reads. “Instead, they were looking to either start including or
        increasing their exposure to crypto.” 
    Improved appetite and positive sentiment among institutions did not only extend to
        buying, trading and holding individual cryptoassets. Also coming into vogue is the extended use of Ethereum
        for asset tokenisation projects. 
    One EU report which came out in late February showed that $33bn
            per year could be saved from bond issuances by using public blockchains
        like Ethereum. 
    A survey by HSBC and Northern Trust this
            month suggested that by 2030, between 5% and 10% of all assets would be
        tokenised. 
    February also saw a flurry of moves from governments and institutions in this regard.
        Siemens was the latest corporate to join the digital securities revolution, using the Polygon blockchain to
        conduct a ,
        while Deutsche Bank tested a tokenised fund using a private blockchain.
    
    3. On-chain Signals 
    Bitcoin
    Liquidity demand: Exchange flows
    The amount of Bitcoin travelling between exchanges and on-chain wallets declined by
        14% in February. Outflows and inflows together amounted to 27.4 billion worth of Bitcoin in February against
        $32.1 billion for the month of January. 
    This reflects the stable price of Bitcoin which has caused holders to largely retain
        positions instead of responding to volatility by moving funds between off-chain and on-chain
        addresses.
    Bitcoin exchange inflows marginally beat outflows. Inflows capped off at $13.8
        billion while outflows totalled $13.6 billion. Neutral Bitcoin
    Futures Activity
    Bitcoin futures volume rose by 12% to $787 billion in February. This is the highest
        figure recorded since October 2022. Traders are returning to the Bitcoin futures market in size after
        despondent conditions caused apprehension towards the end of last year. Bullish
        Bitcoin
    
        
    
    Institutional Demand
    Inflows into Bitcoin-based investment products in Europe saw a cooldown in February
        after the massive influx of institutional capital that flooded in last month.
    In the 30 days to 24 February, $114 million entered spot Bitcoin ETPs with 19% of
        this breaking into ETC Group’s flagship Bitcoin product (Ticker: BTCE).  Bullish
        Bitcoin
    Ethereum
    Liquidity Demand: Exchange Flows
    Total flows in February reached $41.1 billion worth of Ethereum and saw no real
        change compared to January. Exchange outflows of $20.7 billion and inflows of $20.4 billion cancelled one
        another out.
    This metric signals there is no clear buy or sell sentiment among investors that are
        still waiting to see how the market reacts to the withdrawal of staked Ethereum from the Beacon Chain in
        March. 
    Traders tend to move digital assets onto exchanges when they experience selling
        pressure and shift them to self-custody wallets when they seek to conserve their holdings. Neutral Ethereum
    Futures Activity
    Ethereum futures transactions were worth $530 billion in February and rivalled the
        healthy futures volume seen in January. The majority of Ethereum futures trading took place on crypto
        exchanges registered outside the USA like Binance and OKX. Bullish Ethereum
    
    4. Into the Metaverse 
    Japan has sealed the deal on a ‘Metaverse Economic Zone’ which will use a
        combination of gaming, fintech and IT to build an open metaverse for enterprises. Subtitled ‘Launching
        industrial applications for a digital twin society’, a 28 February  release details how a group of banks including SMBG, Resona and MUFG joins industry titans like IT services
        group Fujitsu and car manufacturer Mitsubishi. 
    Together they will build out content that “takes on the form of a moving city,
        castle or vehicle that roams around that virtual world”, with users engaging in a role-playing
        game-like experience. 
    While it’s often difficult to separate press-release-speak for real-world
        action, what is clear is that Japan’s largest finance companies are taking on key elements of Web3.
    
    The platform “automatically learns each avatar’s behaviour as a digital
        twin and can provide personalised information on health care and hobbies”, while payments and
        authentication will be handled by a Multi-Magic Passport (MMP) created by JCB, Japan’s only
        international payment brand. The MMP can register NFTs, avatar skins and other game-like items and should
        allow users to travel and spend between metaverse services. This sounds a lot like a decentralised identity
        feature, one of the key elements of Web3.
    Merging the open metaverse and Web3
    Decentralised identity (DID) is one of the foundational elements of Web3, moving
        users from Web2’s ‘read+write’ to ‘read+write+own’. It relies on cryptography
        to provide an unambiguous descriptor so that users can control their digital identity without relying on a
        specific provider, like Twitter, or Google. In July 2022 DID became an official
            Web standard. 
    Digital twins
    One of the more intriguing parts of the metaverse concerns its industrial, rather
        than retail use case. Digital ‘twins’ — digitise versions of real-world supply lines,
        ports and factory floors — are gaining in popularity due to the operational cost savings that can be
        made from using augmented reality digital overlays on real world objects, speeding up manufacturing and
        identifying issues more quickly. 
    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has said that he sees digital twins alone as a $40bn per year
        revenue opportunity. The comments, made during the semiconductor giant’s fiscal Q3 2022 update
        suggested that its Avatars product, part of the company’s Omniverse software suite, suggest the scale
        of the opportunity available. 
    Huang said: “I demonstrated probably the largest application of robots in the
        future, and it’s avatars. We built Omniverse Avatars to make it easy for people to integrate some
        amazing technology, for speech recognition, natural language [processing], facial animation and speech
        synthesis, all of that integrated into one system and running in real time.” The Avatars software is
        available on a subscription basis and costs $1,000 per year per user.  
    
        
    
    And just as cryptocurrencies battle it out to become the industry standards in
        transferring assets and value, so a similar war is waging to create and install the standards of the
        metaverse. 
    Nvidia put forward its USD filetype for building and composing 3D assets in August
        2022, based on the Universal
            Scene Descriptor language originally created by animation studio Pixar.
    
    Elsewhere in key metaverse equities: Meta released figures showing total revenue was 1% down in 2022: $116.6 billion from $117.9 billion in
        2021. Despite the fall in revenue, the tech conglomerate’s stock is up 40% year-to-date.
    Investor confidence in the company has seen a renewal after CEO Mark Zuckerberg
        called for a “year
            of efficiency” that will see the company curtail spending on costly
        R&D projects. 
    Instead, Meta is determined to generate profit from its bread and butter products.
        Meta is launching a new service called Meta Verified, a subscription package available on social media
        platforms Instagram and Facebook.
    It promises to allow users to authenticate accounts with badges, provides improved
        account support, and strengthens visibility and engagement on the platforms. The service is presently
        undergoing a pilot phase in Australia and New Zealand. 
    (NASDAQ:RBLX) had perhaps the best month of all
        metaverse equities, integrating generative AI into its codebase to help users build games faster and more
        effectively. 
    The California-based company defied forecasts that user interest in its products
        could wane after the lifting of COVID restrictions in 2022. Average daily users amounted to 54 million (up 23% Y-o-Y) and total company revenue was $2.2 billion (up 16% Y-o-Y).
    
    An increasing number of household brands from Spotify to the NFL are using Roblox to
        engage with a worldwide customer base. The user-generated content platform reached partnerships with more than 100 brands in 2022. 
    More than 90% of all items published in the Roblox marketplace are now made by independent creators.
        Roblox’s economy is now a stone’s throw away from being entirely supported by user-generated
        content.
        Finally, we turn to Qualcomm. 
    The graphic chips and wireless technology firm’s stock has added 16% YTD in
        spite of its last earnings report showing revenue was down year-over-year. 
    Qualcomm supplies chipsets that are used in virtual and extended reality headsets to
        a number of retail manufacturers like Meta. More recently, Samsung announced it will be integrating Qualcomm chips in devices that will allow clients to enter the
        Metaverse. 
    Qualcomm has also reiterated that it will continue to produce 5G chipsets for Apple’s new iPhone that will be
        released to the end of the year.
        
    5. Digital Asset Equities 
    In terms of the critical equities supporting cryptoasset industries, there are few
        bigger than semiconductor company Advanced Micro Devices. AMD posted revenue figures of $5.6 billion for the fourth quarter of 2022 – a year-over-year
        increase of 16%. 
    AMD specialises in computing, visualisation, and graphics through products like
        graphic processing units (GPUs) and central processing units (CPUs). But in 2022 growth was chiefly driven
        by its data centres. 
    Growth in this vertical was driven by deepening industrial interest  in cloud
        computing services and products, for which AMD has become a hub. AMD ended 2022 with $23.6 billion in
        revenue, of which $1.3 billion constituted net income.
    NVIDIA closed 2022 with $27 billion in revenue, flat from the previous year. The computer hardware
        company is pivoting itself toward AI technology with plans for new AI-powered supercomputers underway.
    
    In December, NVIDIA announced a partnership with Deutsche Bank to accelerate the adoption of AI in financial services. This is expected to allow banks to automate
        functions like risk evaluation that will be played out over multiple simulations and preclude the need for
        manual supervision. 
    NVIDIA also announced a collaboration
        with Lockheed Martin to build a digital simulation of global weather conditions
        so it can help frontline workers like firefighters or the coast guard train for and detect extreme weather
        conditions with more certainty.  
    Microchip Technology had
        record sales of $2.1
            billion in the three months to 31 December 2022 – up 23% from a year
        ago – as demand for graphic processing chips continues to heighten.
    The semiconductor company serves industries ranging from computing and industrial to
        defence and aerospace. Microchip shares have added 18% since the start of the year against 4% for the
        S&P 500.
        
    6. Outlook 
    There are multiple bullish themes emerging in March and beyond, and we expect those
        to collide headlong into macroeconomic and liquidity considerations. 
    With Bitcoin rejecting $25k and Ethereum holding steady in the $1.6k region, industry
        dynamics are in flux, awaiting the next major move to the upside or downside. 
    We expect ETH unstaking to bring much more institutional capital into Ethereum,
        rather than less, and we do not see the ‘rush to the exits’ playing out as has been suggested in
        other quarters. 
    The deployment of Layer 2 protocols on Ethereum is a positive sign of its health and
        development. There are a number of L2s battling for blockspace on Ethereum and it will be important to track
        which ones will be the biggest winners. 
    Until now, there has been no index products to map out and track the value of the
        disparate Layer 2 protocols inhabiting the Ethereum blockchain. As the ecosystem is inhabited with more
        protocols built on top of it – and the total value locked in them –, the space is calling out
        for a product that can provide exposure to the L2s with the most utility and value in the Ethereum
        space.
    Macroeconomic considerations will play a part in the coming weeks and months, and
        certainly the suggestion of higher US rates for longer has weighed on equities. A pivot point for central
        banks — including the Fed and the ECB — starting to reduce interest rates now looks to be
        further out than expected at the start of this year. Bond market futures suggest this disinflationary period
        will be pushed out to September/October instead of July/August. 
    However: with crypto correlations to equities and commodities diving lower across the
        month, this infers that Bitcoin and Ethereum are less sensitive than they normally would be to macro data
        releases. 
    As we suggested in our January
            2023 Digital Assets and Metaverse Monthly Review: 
    On a technical basis Bitcoin’s run up to ~$23,400 represents a significant area
        of resistance, from where BTC was rejected, setting the stage for a potential deflation in the exuberant
        rally that has consumed most of January. 
    “We expect profit-taking to dominate the conversation in the first weeks of
        February, possibly with an over-reaction to the downside to see Bitcoin at around $20,500.”
    This thesis has proven to be largely correct: albeit Bitcoin has not taken the
        downside as far as we expected. This is in part attributable to the sudden rise of Bitcoin Ordinals.
    
    On-chain data clearly suggests that recent pullbacks in Bitcoin relate to profit
        taking, rather than a broader structural downturn in sentiment. Relatively higher BTC/USD spot volume than
        the 12 month average, and the largest amount since November 2022, indicates growing interest in the asset
        class from retail participants. 
    Add to this increasing venture dry powder being deployed, a number of significant
        product launches, an entirely new revenue stream for Bitcoin using Ordinals, and the frothier elements of
        the market in DeFi and NFTs seeing uptake, and we see more positives than negatives in the outlook for the
        rest of the quarter. 
    As such, we leave our Bitcoin and Ethereum price projections unchanged.
    
        
    
    
                                                            
                                    Important information:
                                    This article does not constitute investment advice, nor does it constitute an offer or solicitation to buy financial products. This article is for general informational purposes only, and there is no explicit or implicit assurance or guarantee regarding the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of this article or the opinions contained therein. It is advised not to rely on the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of this article or the opinions contained therein. Please note that this article is neither investment advice nor an offer or solicitation to acquire financial products or cryptocurrencies.
                                    Before investing in crypto ETPs, potentional investors should consider the following:
                                    Potential investors should seek independent advice and consider relevant information contained in the base prospectus and the final terms for the ETPs, especially the risk factors mentioned therein. The invested capital is at risk, and losses up to the amount invested are possible. The product is subject to inherent counterparty risk with respect to the issuer of the ETPs and may incur losses up to a total loss if the issuer fails to fulfill its contractual obligations. The legal structure of ETPs is equivalent to that of a debt security. ETPs are treated like other securities.