- Last week, cryptoassets continued to underperform on account ongoing profit-taking by large long-term holders
 
		    - Our in-house "Cryptoasset Sentiment Indicator" has declined sharply and signals bearish sentiment again
 
		    - Ongoing profit-taking by large long-term holders such as German government entities or the Mt Gox trustee will likely continue to be a headwind over the coming weeks
 
        
	    
	                                 
                                                                                    	    
        Chart of the Week
		
			Bitcoin Long-term Holder (LTH) Realized Profit
		    
		        
		        
		    
		    
				Source: Glassnode, ETC Group
		    
		
Performance
Last week, cryptoassets continued to underperform on account ongoing profit-taking by large
    long-term holders. This is also evident in the high readings of long-term holder’s (LTH) realized
    profits for Bitcoin (Chart-of-the-Week). 
In this context, large long-term holders such as German government entities or the Mt
    Gox trustee continue to distribute their long-term holdings that they acquired many years back. 
More recently, the Mt Gox trustee has also started distributing bitcoins. The trustee
    sold around 2.7k BTC on Friday alone last week. At the time of writing, the Mt Gox trustee still controls
    around 139k BTC according to data provided by Glassnode. Another major force of selling was the German
    government that sold around 6.4k BTC over the past week. This particular government entity still controls
    around 39.8k BTC. 
Looking ahead, we still anticipate this amount of selling to continue to be a headwind for the
    overall market. In our latest monthly
        report we also wrote:
“Continued selling from US and German government entities could likely exert
    continued selling pressure on the market over the coming weeks.”
It may take time for the market to fully digest this level of selling as opined by
    some influential market observers. This is due to the fact that much of the legacy
    supply that was accumulated by government entities (US and Germany), large trusts (GBTC) or legacy exchanges
    (Mt Gox) over the past years is currently being distributed again. 
That being said, our Cryptoasset Sentiment Index has touched a fresh 2-months low
    again and is currently signalling relatively bearish sentiment and positioning again. 
    	
		    Cross Asset Performance (Week-to-Date)
		    
		        
		        
		    
		    
				Source: Bloomberg, Coinmarketcap; performances in USD exept Bund Future
		    
		
		
		    Top 10 Cryptoasset Performance (Week-to-Date)
		    
		        
		        
		    
		    
				Source: Coinmarketcap
		    
		
In general, among the top 10 crypto assets, TRON, Toncoin, and Solana were the
    relative outperformers. 
Overall, altcoin outperformance vis-à-vis Bitcoin has significantly reversed
    again compared to the prior week, with only 20% of our tracked altcoins managing to outperform Bitcoin on a
    weekly basis. Ethereum also underperformed Bitcoin on a weekly basis. 
Sentiment
Our in-house “Cryptoasset Sentiment
    Index” has declined sharply and signals a bearish sentiment again.
At the moment, only 5 out of 15 indicators are above their short-term trend.
Last week, there were significant reversals to the downside in the BTC Short-Term
    Holder Net Unrealized Profit/Loss ratio (STH-NUPL) and the Crypto Fear & Greed Index. 
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index still signals a “Fear” level of
    sentiment as of this morning. 
Performance dispersion among cryptoassets has reversed to the downside again. This
    means that altcoins are increasingly becoming correlated with the performance of Bitcoin again. 
Altcoin outperformance vis-à-vis Bitcoin has also significantly reversed
    compared to the week prior, with only around 20% of our tracked altcoins outperforming Bitcoin on a weekly
    basis, which is consistent with the fact that Ethereum also underperformed Bitcoin last week.
In general, increasing (decreasing) altcoin outperformance tends to be a sign of
    increasing (decreasing) risk appetite within cryptoasset markets and the latest altcoin underperformance
    could signal declining appetite for risk at the moment.
In contrast, sentiment in traditional financial markets rebounded from its multi-year
    lows along with a rebound in market-based global growth expectations, judging by our own measure of Cross
    Asset Risk Appetite (CARA).
Fund Flows
Despite the weak price action last week, fund flows into global crypto ETPs continued
    to be positive and even started to accelerate again. Global crypto ETPs saw around +695.9 mn USD in net
    inflows across all types of cryptoassets which is significantly higher than the +38.2 mn USD in net inflows
    recorded the prior week. 
Global Bitcoin ETPs saw net inflows of
    +632.7 mn USD last week, of which +238.5 mn USD in net inflows were related to US spot Bitcoin ETFs. 
Last week also saw significant inflows into Hong Kong Bitcoin ETFs with +247.2 mn USD
    which was even slightly higher than US spot Bitcoin ETF net inflows. 
Outflows from the ETC
        Group Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTCE) continued last week with net outflows equivalent
    to -42.0 mn USD while the ETC
        Group Core Bitcoin ETP (BTC1) saw neither in- nor outflows last
    week.
The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) continued to see net outflows, with around -87.9
    mn USD last week. 
Meanwhile, global Ethereum ETPs saw a
    reversal in flows last week compared to the week prior with positive net inflows totalling +7.7 mn USD.
    Interestingly, Hong Kong Ethereum ETFs neither recorded in- nor outflows last week (+/- 0 mn USD). 
The ETC
        Group Physical Ethereum ETP (ZETH) saw minor net outflows of around -1.7 mn USD
    and the ETC
        Group Ethereum Staking ETP (ET32) showed sticky AuM last week (+/- 0 mn
    USD in flows).
In contrast, altcoin ETPs ex Ethereum continued to attract
    an even higher amount of capital of around +20.1 mn USD last
    week.
The same is true for Thematic & basket crypto
    ETPs which also continued to see positive net inflows of +35.4 mn USD, based on our
    calculations. The ETC
        Group MSCI Digital Assets Select 20 ETP (DA20) saw neither in- nor
    outflows last week. 
Meanwhile, global crypto hedge funds have continued to increase their market exposure even
    further into the most recent correction. The 20-days rolling beta of global crypto hedge funds’
    performance increased to around 0.66 (up from 0.57) per yesterday’s close.
On-Chain Data
Bitcoin on-chain data currently show a significant level of “pain” among
    short-term holders which renders a short-term bottom very likely. 
For instance, the short-term holder net unrealized profit-loss ratio (STH-NUPL) is
    currently at -14.6% meaning that the average short-term holder has around -14.6% in unrealized losses. This
    metric is already at the lowest level since November 2022 – when FTX collapsed!
Furthermore, the short-term holder spent output profit ratio (STH-SOPR) has declined
    to 0.957 last Friday – the lowest level since end of 2022 as well. 
Short-term holders are investors with a holding period of less than 155 days.
At the time of writing, the average cost basis of short-term holders lies at around
    64k USD per bitcoin according to data provided by Glassnode which means that short-term holders are
    significantly “under water” with their holdings. It is no surprise that short-term holders have
    continued to realize large amounts of losses into the most recent correction. 
This seems to have exacerbated the most recent downside price correction. 
That being said, profit-taking by long-term holders is currently the dominant force
    that is exerting selling pressure on the market. 
This is also evident in the high levels of long-term holders' (LTH) realised gains for
    bitcoin (Chart-of-the-Week). 
In this context, large long-term holders such as the German government or the Mt Gox
    trustee continue to distribute their long-term holdings acquired many years ago. 
Recently, the Mt. Gox trustee has also started to distribute bitcoins. On Friday of
    last week alone, the trustee sold around 2.7k BTC. At the time of writing, the Mt. Gox trustee still
    controls around 139k BTC, according to Glassnode. Another major selling force was the German government,
    which sold around 6.4k BTC last week. This particular government entity still controls around 39.8k BTC.
Looking ahead, we still anticipate this amount of selling to continue to be a headwind for the
    overall market as opined in our latest monthly
        report.
Besides, the hash ribbon signal also implies that BTC miners still remain under
    economic pressure which signals a heightened risk of continued distributions from these entities as well.
Moreover, the market lacks new catalysts that would lead to a significant influx of new
    short-term investors as shown by the Short- to Long-Term Realized Value (SLRV) Ribbon signal.
     
Despite the fact that we saw a positive reversal of global net inflows into Bitcoin
    ETPs over the past 2 weeks, net buying volumes on BTC spot exchanges continue to be negative, highlighting
    the high selling pressure from other types of investors. 
On a positive note, this high degree of selling implies that sellers could become
    exhausted relatively soon which would lead to a stabilization in prices. 
Futures, Options & Perpetuals
Last week, both BTC futures and perpetual open interest declined amid an increase in
    forced long liquidations. 
Nonetheless, perpetual funding rates mostly remained positive throughout last week.
    When the funding rate is positive (negative), long (short) positions periodically pay short (long)
    positions. A positive funding rate tends to be a sign of bullish sentiment in perpetual futures markets.
     
The 3-months annualized BTC futures basis rate declined significantly to only around
    8.0% p.a. 
BTC options’ open interest increased significantly last week after the large
    expiries at the end of June. This increase in open interest was largely driven by an increase in relative
    put open interest consistent with the recent price correction as BTC option traders increased their downside
    bets/hedges. However, the aggregate put-call open interest ratio still remains significantly lower than
    during the highs observed in March. 
That being said, both the spike in put-call volume ratios as well as 1-month 25-delta
    option skew signalled a significant increase in demand for downside protection. 
BTC option implied volatilities have also increased slightly during the latest leg
    down. Implied volatilities of 1-month ATM Bitcoin options are currently at around 50.5% p.a. The term
    structure of volatility is also inverted now with short-dated options trading at significantly higher
    implied volatilities than longer-dated options. This tends to be a sign of overextended bearishness in the
    options market. 
Bottom Line
    
        - Last week, cryptoassets continued to underperform on account ongoing profit-taking by large long-term
            holders
 
        - Our in-house "Cryptoasset Sentiment Indicator" has declined sharply and signals bearish sentiment again
 
        - Ongoing profit-taking by large long-term holders such as German government entities or the Mt Gox trustee
            will likely continue to be a headwind over the coming weeks
 
    
 
Appendix
		
	        Bitcoin Price vs Cryptoasset Sentiment Index
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, Coinmarketcap, Glassnode, NilssonHedge, alternative.me, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
	        Cryptoasset Sentiment Index
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, Coinmarketcap, Glassnode, NilssonHedge, alternative.me, ETC Group; *multiplied by (-1)
	        
	    
		
	        Cryptoasset Sentiment Index
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, Coinmarketcap, Glassnode, NilssonHedge, alternative.me, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
	        TradFi Sentiment Indicators
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, NilssonHedge, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
	        Crypto Sentiment Indicators
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Coinmarketcap, alternative.me, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
	        Crypto Options' Sentiment Indicators
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Glassnode, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
	        Crypto Futures & Perpetuals' Sentiment Indicators
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Glassnode, ETC Group; *Cumulative daily absolute change in BTC OI multiplied by sign of BTC price change
	        
	    
		
	        Crypto On-Chain Indicators
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Glassnode, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
			Bitcoin vs Crypto Fear & Greed Index
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: alternative.me, Coinmarketcap, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
	        Bitcoin vs Global Crypto ETP Fund Flows
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, ETC Group; Only ETPs & Grayscale Trusts
	        
	    
		
	        Global Crypto ETP Fund Flows
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, ETC Group; Only ETPs & Grayscale Trusts
	        
	    
		
	        US Spot Bitcoin ETF Fund Flows
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, ETC Group; data subject to change
	        
	    
		
	        US Spot Bitcoin ETFs: Flows since launch
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, Fund flows since traiding launch on 11/01/24; data subject to change
	        
	    
		
	        US Spot Bitcoin ETFs: 5-days flow
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomber; data subject to change
	        
	    
		
	        US Bitcoin ETFs: Net Fund Flows since 11th Jan mn USD
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Bloomberg, ETC Group; data as of 05-07-2024
	        
	    
		
			Bitcoin vs Crypto Hedge Fund Beta
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Coinmarketcap, Bloomberg, NilssonHedge, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
			Altseason Index
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Coinmarketcap, ETC Group
	        
	    
		
			Bitcoin vs Crypto Dispersion Index
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Coinmarketcap, ETC Group; Dispersion = (1 - Average Altcoin Correlation with Bitcoin)
	        
	    
		
			BTC Net Exchange Volume by Size
	        
                
	            
	        
	        
	            Source: Glassnode, ETC Group
	        
	    
	                                                            
                                    Important information:
                                    This article does not constitute investment advice, nor does it constitute an offer or solicitation to buy financial products. This article is for general informational purposes only, and there is no explicit or implicit assurance or guarantee regarding the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of this article or the opinions contained therein. It is advised not to rely on the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of this article or the opinions contained therein. Please note that this article is neither investment advice nor an offer or solicitation to acquire financial products or cryptocurrencies.
                                    Before investing in crypto ETPs, potentional investors should consider the following:
                                    Potential investors should seek independent advice and consider relevant information contained in the base prospectus and the final terms for the ETPs, especially the risk factors mentioned therein. The invested capital is at risk, and losses up to the amount invested are possible. The product is subject to inherent counterparty risk with respect to the issuer of the ETPs and may incur losses up to a total loss if the issuer fails to fulfill its contractual obligations. The legal structure of ETPs is equivalent to that of a debt security. ETPs are treated like other securities.